Millerman School Kojève, The Notion of Authority, 1942

Authority without reaction

In 1942, in the middle of the Second World War, Alexandre Kojève wrote a short treatise on authority. He defines it as the ability to act on someone without their reacting against you, even though they could.

Apply that definition to language models and one fact stands out: how often people stop arguing with them.

Authority or force

Someone acts on another person. Choose what happens next.

a model the one acting no reaction

Four pure types

Kojève finds four pure types of authority. Each rests on a different relation to time and goes back to a different theory. Real authorities mix them. Choose a type, then put a language model on the diagram.

eternity past present future Father Master empty Leader Judge a model

Four questions for your last conversation with a model

Father
Did you accept an answer because it seemed to carry the weight of everything ever written?
Judge
Did you accept it because it sounded fair and had no stake in the outcome?
Leader
Did you follow a plan or a forecast because it seemed to see further than you do?
Master
What did the model risk by answering you?

Deference without a fight

In Hegel’s story, which Kojève taught for six years in Paris, the Slave defers because he chose life over the fight. When we defer to a model, there was never a fight.

What is the authority of a thing that has never risked anything?

The text

Kojève wrote La Notion de l’autorité in 1942. It was published in French only in 2004, and in English, as The Notion of Authority, in 2014. He traces the Father to scholastic theology, the Master to Hegel, the Leader to Aristotle, and the Judge to Plato.

For the four types applied to human leaders, see the Kojève visualizer at Millerman School.

Kojève, Strauss, and tyranny

Kojève’s best-known exchange is with Leo Strauss, over Xenophon’s dialogue on tyranny: whether the philosopher should advise rulers, and whether a universal and homogeneous state would complete history or put an end to philosophy. My course on Strauss’s On Tyranny reads Xenophon’s dialogue and Strauss’s commentary, where that exchange begins.

See the On Tyranny course

More instruments on AI

Keep in touch